Return-Path: Delivered-To: apmail-httpd-dev-archive@httpd.apache.org Received: (qmail 97036 invoked by uid 500); 29 Aug 2002 14:55:13 -0000 Mailing-List: contact dev-help@httpd.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk Reply-To: dev@httpd.apache.org list-help: list-unsubscribe: list-post: Delivered-To: mailing list dev@httpd.apache.org Received: (qmail 96956 invoked from network); 29 Aug 2002 14:55:12 -0000 Message-ID: <3D6E3478.8030609@ptc.com> Date: Thu, 29 Aug 2002 09:49:28 -0500 From: "Jess M. Holle" Organization: Parametric Technology Corporation User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows; U; Windows NT 5.0; en-US; rv:1.0.0) Gecko/20020530 X-Accept-Language: en-us, en MIME-Version: 1.0 To: dev@httpd.apache.org Subject: Re: Segmentation fault when downloading large files References: <20020827122156.D13606-100000@foem.leiden.webweaving.org> <3D6B5756.D5DE1472@vlafo.be> <3D6CA177.D08528F1@vlafo.be> <3D6CAA6E.D6971A75@vlafo.be> <3D6CAACB.EE0DEF6E@vlafo.be> <5.1.0.14.2.20020828073402.028d97a0@pop3.rowe-clan.net> <3D6CC55C.DB7 <3D6DC7F6.4975B6D7@vlafo.be> Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="------------070003010804070701080907" X-OriginalArrivalTime: 29 Aug 2002 14:54:26.0849 (UTC) FILETIME=[F877C910:01C24F6B] X-Spam-Rating: daedalus.apache.org 1.6.2 0/1000/N --------------070003010804070701080907 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Really? I've built mod_jk v1.2.0 (i.e. from jtc 4.0.4 sources) against 2.0.40 on Windows, Solaris, and AIX (and HP provides one for 2.0.39 on HPUX, but hasn't gotten to 2.0.40 last I saw) -- though on AIX I had crashes until Jeff Trawick helped me navigate the insanity of AIX linking (which the 2.0.40 build process did not reliably do out-of-the-box). -- Jess Holle Peter Van Biesen wrote: >That's a bit of a problem for the moment, I've compiled 2.0.40, but >httpd complains at runtime about mod_jk, apparently something has >changed in the module api ... I'm using the last version of the >connectors ( 4.0.4 ). Or is there a newer version somewhere ? > >Peter. > >Justin Erenkrantz wrote: > > >>On Wed, Aug 28, 2002 at 02:43:08PM +0200, Peter Van Biesen wrote: >> >> >>>I now have a reproducable error, a httpd which I can recompile ( it's >>>till a 2.0.39 ), so, if anyone wants me to test something, shoot ! Btw, >>> >>> >>Can you upgrade to at least .40 or better yet the latest CVS >>version? -- justin >> >> > > > --------------070003010804070701080907 Content-Type: text/html; charset=us-ascii Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Really?

I've built mod_jk v1.2.0 (i.e. from jtc 4.0.4 sources) against 2.0.40 on Windows, Solaris, and AIX (and HP provides one for 2.0.39 on HPUX, but hasn't gotten to 2.0.40 last I saw) -- though on AIX I had crashes until Jeff Trawick helped me navigate the insanity of AIX linking (which the 2.0.40 build process did not reliably do out-of-the-box).

--
Jess Holle

Peter Van Biesen wrote:
That's a bit of a problem for the moment, I've compiled 2.0.40, but
httpd complains at runtime about mod_jk, apparently something has
changed in the module api ... I'm using the last version of the
connectors ( 4.0.4 ). Or is there a newer version somewhere ?

Peter.

Justin Erenkrantz wrote:
  
On Wed, Aug 28, 2002 at 02:43:08PM +0200, Peter Van Biesen wrote:
    
I now have a reproducable error, a httpd which I can recompile ( it's
till a 2.0.39 ), so, if anyone wants me to test something, shoot ! Btw,
      
Can you upgrade to at least .40 or better yet the latest CVS
version?  -- justin


--------------070003010804070701080907--