Return-Path: Delivered-To: apmail-httpd-dev-archive@httpd.apache.org Received: (qmail 84412 invoked by uid 500); 7 Aug 2002 16:48:19 -0000 Mailing-List: contact dev-help@httpd.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk Reply-To: dev@httpd.apache.org list-help: list-unsubscribe: list-post: Delivered-To: mailing list dev@httpd.apache.org Received: (qmail 84375 invoked from network); 7 Aug 2002 16:48:18 -0000 Date: Wed, 7 Aug 2002 09:48:22 -0700 From: Aaron Bannert To: dev@httpd.apache.org Subject: Re: worker mpm -- fdqueue question Message-ID: <20020807164822.GF30965@clove.org> Mail-Followup-To: Aaron Bannert , dev@httpd.apache.org References: <3D514645.4000704@apache.org> <3D51487B.9040204@apache.org> <3D514D86.9050906@apache.org> <3D514E66.7050308@apache.org> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <3D514E66.7050308@apache.org> User-Agent: Mutt/1.4i X-Spam-Rating: daedalus.apache.org 1.6.2 0/1000/N On Wed, Aug 07, 2002 at 09:44:22AM -0700, Ian Holsman wrote: > we might want to move the code from the mpm/worker into > the apr-util area too (which is what I was planning on doing, but if you > beat me to it .. all the better ;-) I just added a new Resource List thing to apr-util that takes the general concepts from this, but I don't think we should move the fdqueue or any of the worker code since it is very specialized. -aaron