Return-Path: Delivered-To: apmail-httpd-dev-archive@httpd.apache.org Received: (qmail 12212 invoked by uid 500); 6 Aug 2002 19:15:30 -0000 Mailing-List: contact dev-help@httpd.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk Reply-To: dev@httpd.apache.org list-help: list-unsubscribe: list-post: Delivered-To: mailing list dev@httpd.apache.org Received: (qmail 12199 invoked from network); 6 Aug 2002 19:15:29 -0000 X-Authentication-Warning: cancer.clove.org: jerenk set sender to jerenkrantz@apache.org using -f Date: Tue, 6 Aug 2002 12:15:34 -0700 From: Justin Erenkrantz To: dev@httpd.apache.org Subject: Re: [request for comments] limiting file bucket setaside Message-ID: <20020806191534.GC6479@apache.org> Mail-Followup-To: Justin Erenkrantz , dev@httpd.apache.org References: <3D4ECA64.4060002@apache.org> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <3D4ECA64.4060002@apache.org> User-Agent: Mutt/1.4i X-Spam-Rating: daedalus.apache.org 1.6.2 0/1000/N On Mon, Aug 05, 2002 at 11:56:36AM -0700, Brian Pane wrote: > I'm eager to try this (post 2.0.40), as it could significantly help > 2.0's performance on keepalive requests. But first, does anyone else > have feedback on the design approach? Sounds fair enough to me. -- justin