httpd-dev mailing list archives

Site index · List index
Message view « Date » · « Thread »
Top « Date » · « Thread »
From Brian Pane <bri...@apache.org>
Subject Re: Is this just Win32, or...
Date Sun, 04 Aug 2002 21:57:15 GMT
William A. Rowe, Jr. wrote:

>CVS Head as of right now [after I fixed my dropped-lead-digit bug in the apr_strtoi64()]...
>
>Trying to serve a pdf, I added \"%{Range}i\" to my access log format just to see what
the
>browser is requesting... the Range header request is for;
>
>bytes=4096-
>
>bytes=287090-288113, 279922-287089, 65536-91023, 91024-121023, 121024-151023, 151024-181023,
181024-211023, 211024-241023,
>241024-271023, 271024-279921
>
>Ok, the second is out of order, a general mess, but that's what Acrobat will do under
IE.
>It's just fine by the rfc ... so first I tested and compared the first request for bytes
4096-
>and that first request worked just fine.
>
>The second bytes= request sends back positively corrupted headers.
>

I just tried the second byterange with a 288144-byte file, using the current
CVS head on Solaris, and it returned a reasonable response header followed
by the expected set of chunks:

HTTP/1.1 206 Partial Content
Date: Sun, 04 Aug 2002 21:49:44 GMT
Server: Apache/2.0.40-dev (Unix)
Last-Modified: Sun, 04 Aug 2002 21:49:00 GMT
ETag: "50af9-46590-ca71eb00"
Accept-Ranges: bytes
Content-Length: 288144
Content-Type: multipart/byteranges; boundary=3a769cd1ff45823f


--3a769cd1ff45823f
Content-type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1
Content-range: bytes 287090-288113/288144
(remainder of the response omitted for clarity)



Mime
View raw message