httpd-dev mailing list archives

Site index · List index
Message view « Date » · « Thread »
Top « Date » · « Thread »
From "JAKE&JEN MCGRATH" <...@lakesplus.com>
Subject Re: cvs commit: httpd-2.0 acinclude.m4
Date Sun, 11 Aug 2002 00:54:44 GMT
remove me from maillist plz
----- Original Message -----
From: "William A. Rowe, Jr." <wrowe@rowe-clan.net>
To: <dev@httpd.apache.org>
Cc: "MATHIHALLI,MADHUSUDAN (HP-Cupertino,ex1)"
<madhusudan_mathihalli@hp.com>; <striker@apache.org>; <dev@httpd.apache.org>
Sent: Friday, August 09, 2002 9:54 PM
Subject: Re: cvs commit: httpd-2.0 acinclude.m4


> At 08:31 PM 8/9/2002, Roy T. Fielding wrote:
> >>Cool. I believe something is better than nothing :).
> >>
> >>(I'm sure you're already aware of this - but thought it'd be better to
let
> >>you know)
> >>I believe my patch went into r1.127 - and has been labelled for the
2.0.40
> >>release. So, you might want to bump the label before it's released.
> >
> >It has already been released.  And where did the three +1 come from
> >anyway?  That is still required on the tarball (not the tag) before
> >the announcement is supposed to go out, even for security releases.
>
> You are absolutely correct.  Consider this my publicly recorded +1.
>
> >2.0.40 will fail to compile for future releases of OpenSSL 0.9.x
> >except for those that also happen to end in e-z or are specifically
> >asked for via the --with-ssl=DIR option in configure.
> >Maybe that could go on the "known bugs" page.
>
> Right on the README.html page of /dist/httpd/ would be a good start.
>
> >I have no idea why the patch was applied just prior to the tag.
>
> Must have been some security conscious over-eager attempt to
> deliver secure code, in spite of third party libraries.
>
> After cutting them [Madhu/Sander] much slack, I'll agree I really
> like your approach much better.  Thanks for the rational compromise
> patch, Roy.
>
> Bill
>


Mime
View raw message