Return-Path: Delivered-To: apmail-httpd-dev-archive@httpd.apache.org Received: (qmail 8731 invoked by uid 500); 23 Jul 2002 23:07:18 -0000 Mailing-List: contact dev-help@httpd.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk Reply-To: dev@httpd.apache.org list-help: list-unsubscribe: list-post: Delivered-To: mailing list dev@httpd.apache.org Received: (qmail 8699 invoked from network); 23 Jul 2002 23:07:17 -0000 X-Authentication-Warning: rdu88-250-182.nc.rr.com: trawick set sender to trawick@attglobal.net using -f Sender: trawick@rdu88-250-182.nc.rr.com To: dev@httpd.apache.org Subject: Re: cvs commit: httpd-2.0 STATUS References: From: Jeff Trawick Date: 23 Jul 2002 19:14:42 -0400 In-Reply-To: Message-ID: Lines: 20 User-Agent: Gnus/5.0808 (Gnus v5.8.8) Emacs/20.7 MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii X-Spam-Rating: daedalus.apache.org 1.6.2 0/1000/N "James Cox" writes: > > If instead I have misunderstood you, please be explicit about which > > behavior you do not want to change. > > > all of it. I took your original comment "leave apachectl to behave as it always has done" to mean "let apachectl work just like 1.3." Is that what you meant? Do you like "apachectl -V" being the recommended way to get pass -V to httpd? Do you like that apachectl now has a user interface with some function accessible via keywords and some function accessible via option chars? -- Jeff Trawick | trawick@attglobal.net Born in Roswell... married an alien...