Return-Path: Delivered-To: apmail-httpd-dev-archive@httpd.apache.org Received: (qmail 81287 invoked by uid 500); 24 Jul 2002 17:26:57 -0000 Mailing-List: contact dev-help@httpd.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk Reply-To: dev@httpd.apache.org list-help: list-unsubscribe: list-post: Delivered-To: mailing list dev@httpd.apache.org Received: (qmail 81273 invoked from network); 24 Jul 2002 17:26:57 -0000 X-Authentication-Warning: rdu88-250-182.nc.rr.com: trawick set sender to trawick@attglobal.net using -f Sender: trawick@rdu88-250-182.nc.rr.com To: dev@httpd.apache.org Subject: Re: Query: bugs 8712 and 10156/NOW 10235 as well. References: <1027270064.1540.5.camel@lerlaptop.lerctr.org> <1027528982.406.24.camel@lerlaptop.iadfw.net> From: Jeff Trawick Date: 24 Jul 2002 13:34:24 -0400 In-Reply-To: <1027528982.406.24.camel@lerlaptop.iadfw.net> Message-ID: Lines: 44 User-Agent: Gnus/5.0808 (Gnus v5.8.8) Emacs/20.7 MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii X-Spam-Rating: daedalus.apache.org 1.6.2 0/1000/N Larry Rosenman writes: > > > 10156 I will plan to commit your patch in the next 24 hours. e-mail me directly if this doesn't happen. > > > 10235 > > What is the exact failure with --enable-mods-shared=all? Are the > > modules built? Do they load? > > I thought I included full scripts.... I can make a shell account > available..... I see the failure to load mod_access now. I got frustrated by all the terminal control sequences at the end of your attachment. Is ap_get_remove_host exported from httpd? nm on httpd should be able to tell. You may need to axe the libtool --silent option (LTFLAGS=' ' ./configure ...), see how httpd and your DSOs are linked, and compare it with what a DSO build of Apache 1.3. Maybe your level of libtool is broken for your platform, maybe there is something that Apache needs to do special. > > What exactly is the IPv6 failure? Did everything build? Was there a > > run-time failure? > Basically, on this platform for now you need to ignore the IPv6 stuff, > and not use it. (there is an API, but no protocol stack). It is the same with many Linux boxes on which Apache works fine without disabling the IPv6 support. We don't choose to disable IPv6 in the build if the API is there. Does Apache fail without --disable-ipv6? Is there a symptom we can check for at configure time? We do check for certain broken APIs and disable it in that situation. Maybe there is another symptom we should check for. -- Jeff Trawick | trawick@attglobal.net Born in Roswell... married an alien...