Return-Path: Delivered-To: apmail-httpd-dev-archive@httpd.apache.org Received: (qmail 2925 invoked by uid 500); 11 Jul 2002 09:44:39 -0000 Mailing-List: contact dev-help@httpd.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk Reply-To: dev@httpd.apache.org list-help: list-unsubscribe: list-post: Delivered-To: mailing list dev@httpd.apache.org Received: (qmail 2888 invoked from network); 11 Jul 2002 09:44:37 -0000 Message-Id: <5.1.0.14.0.20020711112117.00bc9d10@mail.lusidor.nu> X-Sender: lusidor@mail.lusidor.com X-Mailer: QUALCOMM Windows Eudora Version 5.1 Date: Thu, 11 Jul 2002 11:45:12 +0200 To: dev@httpd.apache.org From: Jimmy Lantz Subject: M_GET & http_protcol.c Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"; format=flowed X-AntiAbuse: This header was added to track abuse, please include it with any abuse report X-AntiAbuse: Primary Hostname - bouba.alxhost.com X-AntiAbuse: Original Domain - httpd.apache.org X-AntiAbuse: Originator/Caller UID/GID - [0 0] / [0 0] X-AntiAbuse: Sender Address Domain - lusidor.com X-Spam-Rating: daedalus.apache.org 1.6.2 0/1000/N Hi Dev Gurus, Could anyone please give their 2 cents on my logic below: HEAD requests are turned into M_GET with header_only set to TRUE. By removing ', HEAD' in the line below would make it impossible to LIMIT only HEAD Making HEAD request allowed for all even if you used LimitExcept. Line 1631 in http_protocol.c states (r->allowed & (1 << M_GET)) ? ", GET, HEAD" : "", I'm thinking that I might try to implement a M_HEAD, why has this been discarded in favor for M_GET with header_only? TIA Jimmy {Apache 1.3.26}