Mailing-List: contact dev-help@httpd.apache.org; run by ezmlm
Precedence: bulk
Reply-To: dev@httpd.apache.org
Date: Sat, 6 Jul 2002 11:18:11 -0700
From: Justin Erenkrantz <jerenkrantz@apache.org>
To: dev@httpd.apache.org
Subject: Re: conserving file descriptors vs. ap_save_brigade()
Message-ID: <20020706111811.E20377@apache.org>
Mail-Followup-To: Justin Erenkrantz <jerenkrantz@apache.org>,
	dev@httpd.apache.org
References: <20020706014941.C20377@apache.org>
 <027f01c22501$5607ec30$0a01230a@KOJ>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Disposition: inline
User-Agent: Mutt/1.2.5i
In-Reply-To: <027f01c22501$5607ec30$0a01230a@KOJ>;
 from rbb@covalent.net on Sat, Jul 06, 2002 at 08:25:18AM -0700

On Sat, Jul 06, 2002 at 08:25:18AM -0700, Ryan Bloom wrote:
> > From: Justin Erenkrantz [mailto:jerenkrantz@apache.org]
> > Of course, in the common case of a static file with no filters, we
> > already know the content-length (default handler sets it).
> > 
> > IIRC, I've brought up skipping the C-L filter when we already know
> > the C-L (as defined by r->headers_out), but that was not met with
> > approval.
> 
> Who didn't approve that?  I was under the impression that we did skip
> the C-L filter if we already had a C-L, and it was the filters
> responsibility to remove the C-L if it was changing it.

<Pine.LNX.4.21.0205051824430.16421-100000@shell.ntrnet.net>

I don't know who might have said that.  =)  -- justin