Return-Path: Delivered-To: apmail-httpd-dev-archive@httpd.apache.org Received: (qmail 78111 invoked by uid 500); 3 Jul 2002 20:44:55 -0000 Mailing-List: contact dev-help@httpd.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk Reply-To: dev@httpd.apache.org list-help: list-unsubscribe: list-post: Delivered-To: mailing list dev@httpd.apache.org Received: (qmail 78098 invoked from network); 3 Jul 2002 20:44:55 -0000 From: Jim Jagielski Message-Id: <200207032044.QAA19508@devsys.jaguNET.com> Subject: Re: Christopher Williamson: URGENT: Bug/compatability issue in Apache To: dev@httpd.apache.org Date: Wed, 3 Jul 2002 16:44:58 -0400 (EDT) Reply-To: jim@jaguNET.com In-Reply-To: from "Jim Jagielski" at Jul 03, 2002 04:37:06 PM X-Mailer: ELM [version 2.5 PL5] MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Spam-Rating: daedalus.apache.org 1.6.2 0/1000/N FWIW: httpd-2.0 does not appear to perform this check... +0 for removing the check +1 for making it runtime either way :) Jim Jagielski wrote: > > Hrm.... I would be prone to either removing this patch, or at least > redoing it. As some of you may recall, I mentioned this area a little > bit ago regarding our use and expectation of ANSI sscanf() here as > well. > > > -------- Original Message -------- > > Subject: Christopher Williamson: URGENT: Bug/compatability issue in Apache 1.3.26 > > Date: Wed, 03 Jul 2002 12:49:26 -0600 > > From: Christopher Williamson > > To: martin@apache.org, support@apache.org, bugs@apache.org > > > > Due to an error in OUR online game code, we were incorrectly requesting > > files using 'HTTP-1.0' instead of 'HTTP/1.0' on the GET request line. As you > > know, this is wrong. However, suprisingly, this worked just fine for several > > years with both Apache and other Web servers, presumably because the server > > just ignored it or defaulted to HTTP/1.0. -- =========================================================================== Jim Jagielski [|] jim@jaguNET.com [|] http://www.jaguNET.com/ "A society that will trade a little liberty for a little order will lose both and deserve neither" - T.Jefferson