httpd-dev mailing list archives

Site index · List index
Message view « Date » · « Thread »
Top « Date » · « Thread »
From "Bill Stoddard" <b...@wstoddard.com>
Subject RE: Apache 2 instruction count profile (head as of ~15:00 EDT July 10)
Date Thu, 11 Jul 2002 01:08:01 GMT

Looks like your last commit to apr_tables.c was 4 days ago. This run was
using code I pulled from CVS this afternoon.

Bill

>
> Bill Stoddard wrote:
>
> >Subroutine Name          Source File                  Visit
> Enter  %   Ticks
> >===============          ===========                  =====
> ===== ==== =====
> >.ap_rgetline_core        protocol.c                   36    6
>   1.5 709
> >
>
> Darn, all that optimization work and it's still at the top of the list.
>
> >Shlib Subroutine         Source File                  Visit
> Enter  %   Ticks
> >================         ===========                  =====
> ===== ==== =====
> >.apr_palloc              apr_pools.c                  78    78
>   2.9 1404
> >.__is_wctype_std         libc/__is_wctype_std.c       66    66
>   2.8 1320
> >.apr_table_get           apr_tables.c                 21    17
>   2.6 1229
> >.__divu64                divu64.s                     3     3
>   2.0 976
> >.__divi64                divi64.s                     4     4
>   1.9 917
> >.apr_table_setn          apr_tables.c                 24    12
>   1.6 781
> >
>
> Was this with the latest version of the apr_table code?  If so, I've
> run out of ways to speed up apr_table_get() and apr_table_setn() without
> changing the internal data structure used by the tables to something
> that supports faster-than-O(n) lookups.
>
> --Brian
>
>


Mime
View raw message