httpd-dev mailing list archives

Site index · List index
Message view « Date » · « Thread »
Top « Date » · « Thread »
From "Peter J. Cranstone" <cransto...@msn.com>
Subject RE: c-l filter and buffering of the entire response
Date Wed, 03 Jul 2002 13:01:58 GMT
I stand corrected... 

But there's no reason why the HTTP header cannot be compressed either.
This is especially critical when conserving bandwidth in an wireless
environment. 1200 byte headers are not uncommon and it a latency laden
environment every bit saved enhances the consumers experience. 

Is Apache ready for HTTP header compression?


Peter

-----Original Message-----
From: dirkx@covalent.net [mailto:dirkx@covalent.net] 
Sent: Wednesday, July 03, 2002 6:15 AM
To: dev@httpd.apache.org
Subject: RE: c-l filter and buffering of the entire response


> 3. What if servers start supporting compressed headers. RFC 1144

The 'header' as refered to by the rfc 1144 is not the HTTP header but
the
IP/TCP header.

Or in other words Van Jacobson Compression and other ethernet, IP, TCP
level compression techniques have fundamentally nothing to do with the
socked based TCP stream level on which apache, or any internet protocol
-application- functions.

Dw


Mime
View raw message