Return-Path: Delivered-To: apmail-httpd-dev-archive@httpd.apache.org Received: (qmail 34946 invoked by uid 500); 19 Jun 2002 15:54:41 -0000 Mailing-List: contact dev-help@httpd.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk Reply-To: dev@httpd.apache.org list-help: list-unsubscribe: list-post: Delivered-To: mailing list dev@httpd.apache.org Received: (qmail 34932 invoked from network); 19 Jun 2002 15:54:41 -0000 Date: Wed, 19 Jun 2002 11:52:07 -0400 (EDT) From: Cliff Woolley X-X-Sender: root@deepthought.cs.virginia.edu To: dev@httpd.apache.org Subject: RE: cvs commit: httpd-2.0/modules/filters mod_include.c In-Reply-To: <1024501955.2946.10.camel@localhost> Message-ID: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII X-Spam-Rating: daedalus.apache.org 1.6.2 0/1000/N On Wed, 19 Jun 2002, Brian Pane wrote: > The only case where we'd need to set aside the partial directive > is if there are multiple brigades created for the same request. > Is there any handler that does that? That depends on what you mean by this. Do you mean "multiple brigades that end in EOS"? If so, the answer is no. If you just mean any arbitrary brigades, then sure... any filter could be in front of INCLUDES and pass INCLUDES as many brigades as it wants. --Cliff