Mailing-List: contact dev-help@httpd.apache.org; run by ezmlm
Precedence: bulk
Reply-To: dev@httpd.apache.org
Errors-To: <wrowe@rowe-clan.net>
Message-Id: <5.1.0.14.2.20020628121259.00ba5478@pop3.rowe-clan.net>
Date: Fri, 28 Jun 2002 12:13:42 -0500
To: <rbb@covalent.net>
From: "William A. Rowe, Jr." <wrowe@rowe-clan.net>
Subject: RE: Current CVS segfaults on Win32
Cc: dev@httpd.apache.org
In-Reply-To: <003d01c21ebf$9f030fc0$bc00000a@KOJ>
References: <5.1.0.14.2.20020628110603.0289eba8@pop3.rowe-clan.net>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"; format=flowed

Agreed.  Bug is shot down, I trust.  See my last commit.

Bill

At 11:19 AM 6/28/2002, you wrote:
>Take a look at the code and the stack trace.  It has nothing to do with
>mod_dav_fs.  The "DAV svn" command is failing.  When it goes to look
>"svn" up in the hash table, it doesn't exist.  This is causing the seg
>fault.  So, the only way that mod_dav_fs could be involved is if it is
>creating the provider lookup table.  I haven't read through that part of
>the code yet, but if mod_dav_fs is creating that hash table, then it is
>a bug.
>
>Ryan
>
>----------------------------------------------
>Ryan Bloom                  rbb@covalent.net
>645 Howard St.              rbb@apache.org
>San Francisco, CA
>
> > -----Original Message-----
> > From: William A. Rowe, Jr. [mailto:wrowe@rowe-clan.net]
> > Sent: Friday, June 28, 2002 9:07 AM
> > To: dev@httpd.apache.org
> > Cc: rbb@covalent.net
> > Subject: RE: Current CVS segfaults on Win32
> >
> > At 10:57 AM 6/28/2002, Ryan Bloom wrote:
> > >Nope.  There is no segfault on Linux, just tried it.
> >
> > Did you try without loading mod_dav_fs?  Try loading mod_dav alone.
> >