Return-Path: Delivered-To: apmail-httpd-dev-archive@httpd.apache.org Received: (qmail 73186 invoked by uid 500); 18 Jun 2002 15:11:58 -0000 Mailing-List: contact dev-help@httpd.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk Reply-To: dev@httpd.apache.org list-help: list-unsubscribe: list-post: Delivered-To: mailing list dev@httpd.apache.org Received: (qmail 73171 invoked from network); 18 Jun 2002 15:11:58 -0000 From: Jim Jagielski Message-Id: <200206181511.LAA09063@devsys.jaguNET.com> Subject: Re: Reminder; test/ directories in roll release script To: dev@httpd.apache.org Date: Tue, 18 Jun 2002 11:11:46 -0400 (EDT) Reply-To: jim@jaguNET.com In-Reply-To: from "Cliff Woolley" at Jun 18, 2002 10:53:44 AM X-Mailer: ELM [version 2.5 PL5] MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Spam-Rating: daedalus.apache.org 1.6.2 0/1000/N Cliff Woolley wrote: > > On Tue, 18 Jun 2002, Aaron Bannert wrote: > > > Why shouldn't we be including these in our tarballs? They are perfectly > > valid, IMHO. They don't get built automatically, and they give our > > users something to point at if something breaks. (Also extremely > > useful as a source of example code). > > I totally agree. That's why my heart wasn't broken that they were still > in there for 2.0.39. :) > +1 -- =========================================================================== Jim Jagielski [|] jim@jaguNET.com [|] http://www.jaguNET.com/ "A society that will trade a little liberty for a little order will lose both and deserve neither" - T.Jefferson