Return-Path: Delivered-To: apmail-httpd-dev-archive@httpd.apache.org Received: (qmail 55661 invoked by uid 500); 18 Jun 2002 14:56:15 -0000 Mailing-List: contact dev-help@httpd.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk Reply-To: dev@httpd.apache.org list-help: list-unsubscribe: list-post: Delivered-To: mailing list dev@httpd.apache.org Received: (qmail 55648 invoked from network); 18 Jun 2002 14:56:15 -0000 Date: Tue, 18 Jun 2002 07:56:17 -0700 From: Aaron Bannert To: dev@httpd.apache.org Subject: Re: Reminder; test/ directories in roll release script Message-ID: <20020618075617.F21255@clove.org> Mail-Followup-To: Aaron Bannert , dev@httpd.apache.org References: <5.1.0.14.2.20020618035243.00bd3c90@pop3.rowe-clan.net> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <5.1.0.14.2.20020618035243.00bd3c90@pop3.rowe-clan.net> User-Agent: Mutt/1.3.23i X-Spam-Rating: daedalus.apache.org 1.6.2 0/1000/N On Tue, Jun 18, 2002 at 03:54:16AM -0500, William A. Rowe, Jr. wrote: > We are still failing to cull out > > /test/ > /modules/test/ > /srclib/apr/test/ > /srclib/apr-util/test/ > > Cliff had already rolled the package when we noticed, and we didn't > consider this enough of a showstopper to junk them all. But it would > be good to clean them out as part of our tag and roll shell script. Why shouldn't we be including these in our tarballs? They are perfectly valid, IMHO. They don't get built automatically, and they give our users something to point at if something breaks. (Also extremely useful as a source of example code). -aaron