Return-Path: Delivered-To: apmail-httpd-dev-archive@httpd.apache.org Received: (qmail 3383 invoked by uid 500); 15 Jun 2002 22:38:21 -0000 Mailing-List: contact dev-help@httpd.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk Reply-To: dev@httpd.apache.org list-help: list-unsubscribe: list-post: Delivered-To: mailing list dev@httpd.apache.org Received: (qmail 3369 invoked from network); 15 Jun 2002 22:38:21 -0000 Date: Sat, 15 Jun 2002 15:38:27 -0700 From: Aaron Bannert To: dev@httpd.apache.org Subject: Re: cvs commit: httpd-2.0/modules/mappers mod_userdir.c Message-ID: <20020615153827.W21255@clove.org> Mail-Followup-To: Aaron Bannert , dev@httpd.apache.org References: <20020615072059.46928.qmail@icarus.apache.org> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20020615072059.46928.qmail@icarus.apache.org> User-Agent: Mutt/1.3.23i X-Spam-Rating: daedalus.apache.org 1.6.2 0/1000/N On Sat, Jun 15, 2002 at 07:20:59AM -0000, rbb@apache.org wrote: > 1.50 +5 -5 httpd-2.0/modules/mappers/mod_userdir.c > > Index: mod_userdir.c > =================================================================== > RCS file: /home/cvs/httpd-2.0/modules/mappers/mod_userdir.c,v > retrieving revision 1.49 > retrieving revision 1.50 > diff -u -r1.49 -r1.50 > --- mod_userdir.c 31 May 2002 16:59:13 -0000 1.49 > +++ mod_userdir.c 15 Jun 2002 07:20:59 -0000 1.50 > @@ -347,12 +347,12 @@ > r->pool)) == APR_SUCCESS > || rv == APR_INCOMPLETE))) { > r->filename = apr_pstrcat(r->pool, filename, dname, NULL); > - /* XXX: Does this walk us around FollowSymLink rules? > + /* XXX: Does this walk us around FollowSymLink rules? > * When statbuf contains info on r->filename we can save a syscall > - * by copying it to r->finfo > - */ > - if (*userdirs && dname[0] == 0) > - r->finfo = statbuf; > + * by copying it to r->finfo > + */ > + if (*userdirs && dname[0] == 0) > + r->finfo = statbuf; > > /* For use in the get_suexec_identity phase */ > apr_table_setn(r->notes, "mod_userdir_user", w); Is this anything more than an intentation change, and if so did you mean to include it in the same commit with the shtml AddType fix? -aaron