From dev-return-30404-apmail-httpd-dev-archive=httpd.apache.org@httpd.apache.org Thu Jun 06 16:32:23 2002
Return-Path: <dev-return-30404-apmail-httpd-dev-archive=httpd.apache.org@httpd.apache.org>
Delivered-To: apmail-httpd-dev-archive@httpd.apache.org
Received: (qmail 69839 invoked by uid 500); 6 Jun 2002 16:32:23 -0000
Mailing-List: contact dev-help@httpd.apache.org; run by ezmlm
Precedence: bulk
Reply-To: dev@httpd.apache.org
list-help: <mailto:dev-help@httpd.apache.org>
list-unsubscribe: <mailto:dev-unsubscribe@httpd.apache.org>
list-post: <mailto:dev@httpd.apache.org>
Delivered-To: mailing list dev@httpd.apache.org
Received: (qmail 69826 invoked from network); 6 Jun 2002 16:32:22 -0000
User-Agent: Microsoft-Entourage/10.0.0.1331
Date: Thu, 06 Jun 2002 17:32:23 +0100
Subject: Re: 2.0.37-dev/Solaris-8/sparc-v9
From: Pier Fumagalli <pier@betaversion.org>
To: <dev@httpd.apache.org>, Ian Holsman <lists@holsman.net>
Message-ID: <B9254D27.A09A%pier@betaversion.org>
In-Reply-To: <3CFF71E6.2080208@fujitsu-siemens.com>
Mime-version: 1.0
Content-type: text/plain; charset="US-ASCII"
Content-transfer-encoding: 7bit
X-Spam-Rating: daedalus.apache.org 1.6.2 0/1000/N

Ian Holsman wrote:
> 
> BTW.. you do know that 64bit programs take a ~10% hit in performance
> don't you?

The JVM seems a lot faster (perceived performance, no actual data on hand)
at 64 bits rather than 32...

    Pier