Return-Path: Delivered-To: apmail-httpd-dev-archive@httpd.apache.org Received: (qmail 89691 invoked by uid 500); 28 May 2002 22:51:31 -0000 Mailing-List: contact dev-help@httpd.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk Reply-To: dev@httpd.apache.org list-help: list-unsubscribe: list-post: Delivered-To: mailing list dev@httpd.apache.org Received: (qmail 89673 invoked from network); 28 May 2002 22:51:30 -0000 Date: Tue, 28 May 2002 15:51:50 -0700 Subject: Re: cvs commit: httpd-2.0 STATUS Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII; format=flowed Mime-Version: 1.0 (Apple Message framework v481) From: "Roy T. Fielding" To: dev@httpd.apache.org Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit In-Reply-To: <00b001c20698$69811ca0$8800000a@KOJ> Message-Id: <7F44E363-728D-11D6-AC42-000393753936@apache.org> X-Mailer: Apple Mail (2.481) X-Spam-Rating: daedalus.apache.org 1.6.2 0/1000/N > Sounds good, but I disagree with your STATUS code. It is a 400, not a > 413. The request is completely invalid, not too large. It would be too > large if we had set a limit on the size of requests, but that isn't the > problem. The problem is that they have sent an invalid chunk. No, it is a valid chunk-size. It is simply too large for the data type we chose to implement it with. 413 is the correct response, unless somebody wants to bother implementing large-file input chunks. ....Roy