Return-Path: Delivered-To: apmail-httpd-dev-archive@httpd.apache.org Received: (qmail 3158 invoked by uid 500); 17 May 2002 17:35:16 -0000 Mailing-List: contact dev-help@httpd.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk Reply-To: dev@httpd.apache.org list-help: list-unsubscribe: list-post: Delivered-To: mailing list dev@httpd.apache.org Received: (qmail 3109 invoked from network); 17 May 2002 17:35:15 -0000 Message-ID: <3CE53F57.90100@cnet.com> Date: Fri, 17 May 2002 10:35:19 -0700 From: Brian Pane User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows; U; Windows NT 5.0; en-US; rv:1.0rc2) Gecko/20020510 X-Accept-Language: en-us, en MIME-Version: 1.0 To: dev@httpd.apache.org Subject: Re: cvs commit: httpd-2.0/docs/conf httpd-std.conf.in References: Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Spam-Rating: daedalus.apache.org 1.6.2 0/1000/N Joshua Slive wrote: >On 17 May 2002 brianp@apache.org wrote: > > > >>brianp 02/05/16 18:43:52 >> >> Modified: docs/conf httpd-std.conf.in >> Log: >> Added EnableMMAP (commented out) to the standard config >> >> > >Is this a directive that pretty much everyone using apache needs to know >about? > Yes, especially considering the NFS segfault issues. > My guess is no, and if that is the case, it really doesn't need to >be in the default config file. Even if it does need to be in there, it >could use a significantly briefer description. Instead, you could >consider documenting it further in the performance-notes in the manual. > +0 for using a shorter description (we could replace some details with a "please read the manual" warning, like what we do with ServerRoot) +1 for adding it to the performance notes also. This is one of the many 2.0 changes that need to be included in the performance notes. Is there any plan to replace that document entirely, or is it safe to do incremental edits to it? --Brian