Mailing-List: contact dev-help@httpd.apache.org; run by ezmlm
Precedence: bulk
Reply-To: dev@httpd.apache.org
Date: Wed, 15 May 2002 23:19:50 -0700
From: Aaron Bannert <aaron@clove.org>
To: dev@httpd.apache.org
Subject: Re: cvs commit: httpd-2.0/modules/ssl mod_ssl.c mod_ssl.h
 ssl_engine_config.c ssl_engine_init.c ssl_engine_io.c ssl_engine_kernel.c
 ssl_engine_log.c
Message-ID: <20020515231950.U14245@clove.org>
Mail-Followup-To: Aaron Bannert <aaron@clove.org>, dev@httpd.apache.org
References: <20020516060914.58472.qmail@icarus.apache.org>
 <20020515231401.Z11751@apache.org>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Disposition: inline
In-Reply-To: <20020515231401.Z11751@apache.org>
User-Agent: Mutt/1.3.23i

On Wed, May 15, 2002 at 11:14:01PM -0700, Justin Erenkrantz wrote:
> The only thing I wonder is whether SSLLog and SSLLogLevel should be
> marked as deprecated (via ap_set_deprecated) or whether we should
> silently ignore these directives.  Thoughts?  -- justin

I would be strongly opposed to silently ignoring any deprecated directives
during the 2.0 cycle. Admins may still be using these directives, and
it will confuse the heck out of them if we don't provide some feedback
that they are no longer in use.

-aaron