Return-Path: Delivered-To: apmail-httpd-dev-archive@httpd.apache.org Received: (qmail 14790 invoked by uid 500); 15 May 2002 11:14:22 -0000 Mailing-List: contact dev-help@httpd.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk Reply-To: dev@httpd.apache.org list-help: list-unsubscribe: list-post: Delivered-To: mailing list dev@httpd.apache.org Received: (qmail 14776 invoked from network); 15 May 2002 11:14:21 -0000 Date: Wed, 15 May 2002 13:14:32 +0200 From: Mads Toftum To: dev@httpd.apache.org Subject: Re: PROPOSAL: Release 1.3.25 Message-ID: <20020515111432.GB5280@marvin-lnx.staff.tdk.net> Mail-Followup-To: dev@httpd.apache.org References: <20020515090742.GA5280@marvin-lnx.staff.tdk.net> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: X-Mailer: mutt X-Spam-Rating: daedalus.apache.org 1.6.2 0/1000/N On Wed, May 15, 2002 at 11:28:19AM +0200, Sander Striker wrote: > First of all, mod_ssl isn't an external module. It is in the base > distribution of apache 2.0. Yes, I know that - but it has not been there for very long, and it does not seem to get very much attention except from 2 or 3 people. > Secondly, mod_ssl _is_ production quality. I'm not sure that I agree - loads of fixes has gone in since 2.0.35 and both the MAJOR CHANGES and the TODO lists are rather long. It did not get nearly enough testing before the release IMHO. And the SSL docs need an overhaul too. vh Mads Toftum -- `Darn it, who spiked my coffee with water?!' - lwall