Mailing-List: contact dev-help@httpd.apache.org; run by ezmlm
Precedence: bulk
Reply-To: dev@httpd.apache.org
From: Jim Jagielski <jim@jaguNET.com>
Message-Id: <200205021640.MAA15331@devsys.jaguNET.com>
Subject: Re: Final bump and roll of 2.0.36
To: dev@httpd.apache.org
Date: Thu, 2 May 2002 12:40:32 -0400 (EDT)
Reply-To: jim@jaguNET.com
In-Reply-To: 
 <Pine.LNX.4.44.0205021205340.20015-100000@deepthought.cs.virginia.edu> from
 "Cliff Woolley" at May 02, 2002 12:08:43 PM
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit

+1

2.0.36 is better, plain and simple :)

Cliff Woolley wrote:
> 
> On Thu, 2 May 2002, Greg Ames wrote:
> 
> > ...and no emails reporting strange behavior on the site. +1 for beta.
> 
> +1 for beta from me as well.
> 
> > What about GA?
> 
> IMO:
> 
> pros:
>  * we do people more of a disservice by continue to have them use 2.0.35
>    and find already fixed bugs than by throwing another release at them
>    three weeks later
>  * what you said
> 
> cons:
>  * worker shutdown is still wonky, at least on linux.  part of me would
>    have rather seen it segfault.  but just stick a warning in the release
>    notes to be wary of the potential rough edges there, and I'm okay with
>    it
> 
> --Cliff
> 
> --------------------------------------------------------------
>    Cliff Woolley
>    cliffwoolley@yahoo.com
>    Charlottesville, VA
> 
> 


-- 
===========================================================================
   Jim Jagielski   [|]   jim@jaguNET.com   [|]   http://www.jaguNET.com/
      "A society that will trade a little liberty for a little order
             will lose both and deserve neither" - T.Jefferson