httpd-dev mailing list archives

Site index · List index
Message view « Date » · « Thread »
Top « Date » · « Thread »
From Ian Holsman <>
Subject Re: cvs commit: httpd-2.0 STATUS
Date Sun, 26 May 2002 21:15:00 GMT
Sander Striker wrote:
>>From: Cliff Woolley []
>>Sent: 26 May 2002 19:34
>>On Sun, 26 May 2002, William A. Rowe, Jr. wrote:
>>>>True, but it does _depend_ on httpd.  I'd like to hear a few other
>>>>people's opinions on [the pools patches].  So far it seems to be tied
>>>>up in terms of 2.0.37:  Sander "for", Brian "against", and me
> Correct me if I'm wrong, but I didn't see Brian say he is against.
> His benchmarks show that the patch doesn't affect httpd performance,
> so I don't really get where this is comming from.  Can someone point
> me to a message ID?
> Furthermore, you left Ian out of the loop, who was +1 IIRC.

yep. i'm ++1 even.
we have a internal app which depends on this functionality as well.
it would be nice if they could just use a plain APR instead of a hacked 
up one.

> Sander

View raw message