httpd-dev mailing list archives

Site index · List index
Message view « Date » · « Thread »
Top « Date » · « Thread »
From Ian Holsman <i...@apache.org>
Subject Re: cvs commit: httpd-2.0 STATUS
Date Sun, 26 May 2002 21:15:00 GMT
Sander Striker wrote:
>>From: Cliff Woolley [mailto:jwoolley@virginia.edu]
>>Sent: 26 May 2002 19:34
> 
> 
>>On Sun, 26 May 2002, William A. Rowe, Jr. wrote:
>>
>>
>>>>True, but it does _depend_ on httpd.  I'd like to hear a few other
>>>>people's opinions on [the pools patches].  So far it seems to be tied
>>>>up in terms of 2.0.37:  Sander "for", Brian "against", and me
>>>>undecided.
>>>
> 
> Correct me if I'm wrong, but I didn't see Brian say he is against.
> His benchmarks show that the patch doesn't affect httpd performance,
> so I don't really get where this is comming from.  Can someone point
> me to a message ID?
> 
> Furthermore, you left Ian out of the loop, who was +1 IIRC.

yep. i'm ++1 even.
we have a internal app which depends on this functionality as well.
it would be nice if they could just use a plain APR instead of a hacked 
up one.

> 
>>--Cliff
> 
> 
> Sander
> 




Mime
View raw message