httpd-dev mailing list archives

Site index · List index
Message view « Date » · « Thread »
Top « Date » · « Thread »
From Brian Pane <bp...@pacbell.net>
Subject RE: cvs commit: httpd-2.0 STATUS
Date Sun, 26 May 2002 18:24:49 GMT
On Sun, 2002-05-26 at 11:04, Sander Striker wrote:
> > From: Cliff Woolley [mailto:jwoolley@virginia.edu]
> > Sent: 26 May 2002 19:34
> 
> > On Sun, 26 May 2002, William A. Rowe, Jr. wrote:
> > 
> >>> True, but it does _depend_ on httpd.  I'd like to hear a few other
> >>> people's opinions on [the pools patches].  So far it seems to be tied
> >>> up in terms of 2.0.37:  Sander "for", Brian "against", and me
> >>> undecided.
> 
> Correct me if I'm wrong, but I didn't see Brian say he is against.
> His benchmarks show that the patch doesn't affect httpd performance,
> so I don't really get where this is comming from.  Can someone point
> me to a message ID?

I didn't yet cast a vote.  So,
   -0 for including the pool fix in 2.0.37
   +1 for including it in 2.0.38.

--Brian



Mime
View raw message