Return-Path: Delivered-To: apmail-httpd-dev-archive@httpd.apache.org Received: (qmail 60566 invoked by uid 500); 26 Apr 2002 15:14:45 -0000 Mailing-List: contact dev-help@httpd.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk Reply-To: dev@httpd.apache.org list-help: list-unsubscribe: list-post: Delivered-To: mailing list dev@httpd.apache.org Received: (qmail 60549 invoked from network); 26 Apr 2002 15:14:45 -0000 X-Authentication-Warning: rdu88-250-035.nc.rr.com: trawick set sender to trawick@attglobal.net using -f Sender: trawick@rdu88-250-035.nc.rr.com To: dev@httpd.apache.org Cc: dev@apr.apache.org Subject: Re: Atomics in general References: <200204261332.JAA12084@devsys.jaguNET.com> From: Jeff Trawick Date: 26 Apr 2002 11:10:50 -0400 In-Reply-To: <200204261332.JAA12084@devsys.jaguNET.com> Message-ID: Lines: 13 User-Agent: Gnus/5.0808 (Gnus v5.8.8) Emacs/20.7 MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii X-Spam-Rating: daedalus.apache.org 1.6.2 0/1000/N Jim Jagielski writes: > Maybe we should have atomics disabled by default, at least right > now... with the build problems on some Linuxes and the Solaris > compatibility stuff, it's been snagging us. I don't want it to > delay 2.0.36 if possible. I could go for that or for a --disable-atomic switch which could be used to alleviate any problems if they happen. -- Jeff Trawick | trawick@attglobal.net Born in Roswell... married an alien...