Return-Path: Delivered-To: apmail-httpd-dev-archive@httpd.apache.org Received: (qmail 80819 invoked by uid 500); 5 Apr 2002 02:57:37 -0000 Mailing-List: contact dev-help@httpd.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk Reply-To: dev@httpd.apache.org list-help: list-unsubscribe: list-post: Delivered-To: mailing list dev@httpd.apache.org Received: (qmail 80805 invoked from network); 5 Apr 2002 02:57:37 -0000 Errors-To: Message-Id: <5.1.0.14.2.20020404205552.00bb2c80@pop3.rowe-clan.net> X-Sender: wrowe%rowe-clan.net@pop3.rowe-clan.net X-Mailer: QUALCOMM Windows Eudora Version 5.1 Date: Thu, 04 Apr 2002 20:57:02 -0600 To: dev@httpd.apache.org From: "William A. Rowe, Jr." Subject: Re: cvs commit: apr configure.in In-Reply-To: References: <5.1.0.14.2.20020404175400.00b26c98@pop3.rowe-clan.net> <5.1.0.14.2.20020404175400.00b26c98@pop3.rowe-clan.net> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"; format=flowed X-Spam-Rating: daedalus.apache.org 1.6.2 0/1000/N At 08:31 PM 4/4/2002, you wrote: >"William A. Rowe, Jr." writes: > > > With all of the new config/proc_mutex/hints changes again, once you > > have all beaten upon them, would someone care to summarize the accepted > > "safe" versions so I might tar .34 tommorow? > >I wonder about that tar :) 2.0.34 is not worth using for apache.org >at the moment. Does this relate to other issues, aside from... >Is progress being made on the fast-redirect issue that >I don't know about? When you wrote this? Not that I'm aware of. I should have some time to research this issue and perhaps close the bug tomorrow, early. Bill