Return-Path: Delivered-To: apmail-httpd-dev-archive@httpd.apache.org Received: (qmail 54114 invoked by uid 500); 29 Apr 2002 04:01:51 -0000 Mailing-List: contact dev-help@httpd.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk Reply-To: dev@httpd.apache.org list-help: list-unsubscribe: list-post: Delivered-To: mailing list dev@httpd.apache.org Received: (qmail 54101 invoked from network); 29 Apr 2002 04:01:50 -0000 Message-ID: <3CCCC5B8.4020905@pacbell.net> Date: Sun, 28 Apr 2002 21:02:00 -0700 From: Brian Pane User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows; U; Windows NT 5.0; en-US; rv:0.9.5) Gecko/20011011 X-Accept-Language: en-us MIME-Version: 1.0 To: dev@httpd.apache.org Subject: Re: updated worker, threadpool, and leader/follower performance comparisons Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Spam-Rating: daedalus.apache.org 1.6.2 0/1000/N > With a single listener port (I'll run multi-listener tests later today), > > MPM Requests Mean resp. CPU CPU > type per second time (ms) load utilization > ------------------------------------------------------ > worker 1250 37.4 6.1 65% > leader 1175 40.0 5.6 61% > threadpool 1012 47.1 4.2 47% with two listeners, MPM Requests Mean resp. CPU CPU type per second time (ms) load utilization ------------------------------------------------------ worker 1071 44.3 4.1 51% leader 964 49.4 3.9 46% threadpool 997 47.8 3.9 46%