Return-Path: Delivered-To: apmail-httpd-dev-archive@httpd.apache.org Received: (qmail 70267 invoked by uid 500); 23 Apr 2002 17:53:28 -0000 Mailing-List: contact dev-help@httpd.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk Reply-To: dev@httpd.apache.org list-help: list-unsubscribe: list-post: Delivered-To: mailing list dev@httpd.apache.org Received: (qmail 70254 invoked from network); 23 Apr 2002 17:53:28 -0000 Date: Tue, 23 Apr 2002 10:53:32 -0700 From: Aaron Bannert To: dev@httpd.apache.org Subject: Re: [PATCH] Use expanded path variables instead of @@ServerRoot@@ Message-ID: <20020423105332.I8212@clove.org> Mail-Followup-To: Aaron Bannert , dev@httpd.apache.org References: <20020423103558.B15450@apache.org> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20020423103558.B15450@apache.org> User-Agent: Mutt/1.3.23i X-Spam-Rating: daedalus.apache.org 1.6.2 0/1000/N On Tue, Apr 23, 2002 at 10:35:58AM -0700, Justin Erenkrantz wrote: > This patch should fix PR 8227. > > http://nagoya.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=8227 > > Is there any reason to use @@ServerRoot@@ (and the reason why > I'm posting instead of committing right away)? -- justin I haven't tested this, but I think it's the right way to go. +1 (We probably don't want to be installing the *.conf.in files too, but that's a different problem.) -aaron