From dev-return-27916-apmail-httpd-dev-archive=httpd.apache.org@httpd.apache.org Mon Apr 01 17:45:56 2002 Return-Path: Delivered-To: apmail-httpd-dev-archive@httpd.apache.org Received: (qmail 25552 invoked by uid 500); 1 Apr 2002 17:45:55 -0000 Mailing-List: contact dev-help@httpd.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk Reply-To: dev@httpd.apache.org list-help: list-unsubscribe: list-post: Delivered-To: mailing list dev@httpd.apache.org Received: (qmail 25537 invoked from network); 1 Apr 2002 17:45:55 -0000 Date: Mon, 1 Apr 2002 09:45:58 -0800 From: Aaron Bannert To: dev@httpd.apache.org Subject: Re: 2.0.34 up-to-date wrt cvs HEAD Message-ID: <20020401094558.N1154@clove.org> Mail-Followup-To: Aaron Bannert , dev@httpd.apache.org References: <5.1.0.14.2.20020331201020.02449db8@localhost> <000e01c1d926$18cda700$0a01230a@KOJ> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <000e01c1d926$18cda700$0a01230a@KOJ> User-Agent: Mutt/1.3.23i X-Spam-Rating: daedalus.apache.org 1.6.2 0/1000/N On Sun, Mar 31, 2002 at 06:36:58PM -0800, Ryan Bloom wrote: > If it's possible, I would like to get the perchild changes that I am > working on tonight into 2.0.34. I am tired of the reports that perchild > doesn't compile. :-) I am hoping to have the whole thing working by > the end of the day. I'm not the RM, so it isn't up to me, but I'd prefer that we didn't include perchild in this tag/release. If it were more obvious that it is an experimental piece (by moving it to an experimental directory) then I'd be fine with any changes regardless of how much exposure the new changes have had. -aaron