httpd-dev mailing list archives

Site index · List index
Message view « Date » · « Thread »
Top « Date » · « Thread »
From Cliff Woolley <jwool...@virginia.edu>
Subject Re: cvs commit: httpd-2.0/build httpd_roll_release
Date Fri, 12 Apr 2002 18:08:50 GMT
On 12 Apr 2002 jwoolley@apache.org wrote:

> jwoolley    02/04/12 11:02:10
>
>   Modified:    build    httpd_roll_release
>   Log:
>   * make sure the -alpha name is not _inside_ the gzip (I have to try this and
>     to see if it works that way though)
>
>   -tar cvf $WORKING_DIR-alpha.tar $WORKING_DIR >> $LOG_NAME
>   -cp -p $WORKING_DIR-alpha.tar x$WORKING_DIR-alpha.tar
>   -gzip -9 $WORKING_DIR-alpha.tar
>   -mv x$WORKING_DIR-alpha.tar $WORKING_DIR-alpha.tar
>   -compress $WORKING_DIR-alpha.tar
>   +tar cvf $WORKING_DIR.tar $WORKING_DIR >> $LOG_NAME
>   +cp -p $WORKING_DIR.tar x$WORKING_DIR.tar
>   +gzip -9 $WORKING_DIR.tar
>   +mv $WORKING_DIR.tar.gz $WORKING_DIR-alpha.tar.gz
>   +mv x$WORKING_DIR.tar $WORKING_DIR.tar
>   +compress $WORKING_DIR.tar
>   +mv $WORKING_DIR.tar.Z $WORKING_DIR-alpha.tar.Z

No, these two give exactly the same result, as I originally thought they
would.  So I admit to having no idea why we had to reroll 2.0.35 to get
rid of an -alpha inside the tarball...  where was it?  Not on the
directory name...

--Cliff

--------------------------------------------------------------
   Cliff Woolley
   cliffwoolley@yahoo.com
   Charlottesville, VA


Mime
View raw message