httpd-dev mailing list archives

Site index · List index
Message view « Date » · « Thread »
Top « Date » · « Thread »
From Cliff Woolley <jwool...@virginia.edu>
Subject Re: Install documentation should mention flex requirement for mod_ssl
Date Fri, 12 Apr 2002 17:38:39 GMT
On 12 Apr 2002 bugzilla@apache.org wrote:

>              Status|RESOLVED                    |REOPENED
>          Resolution|INVALID                     |

For one thing, can we please change this "INVALID" thing to "MISTAKEN" or
something more friendly-sounding?


> ------- Additional Comments From paul@murph.org  2002-04-12 16:11 -------
> It's httpd-2.0.35.tar.gz itself which is broken - the files in question have
> incorrect timestamps on them (or have not been pre-built prior to building the
> distribution):
>
> bash-2.03$ gtar tzvf httpd-2.0.35.tar.gz | grep ssl_expr_
> -rw-r--r-- rbb/staff     10300 2002-03-13 20:47
> httpd-2.0.35/modules/ssl/ssl_expr_eval.c
> -rw-r--r-- rbb/staff     34302 2002-01-10 00:28
> httpd-2.0.35/modules/ssl/ssl_expr_parse.c
> -rw-r--r-- rbb/staff       510 2002-01-10 00:28
> httpd-2.0.35/modules/ssl/ssl_expr_parse.h
> -rw-r--r-- rbb/staff      6802 2002-03-13 20:47
> httpd-2.0.35/modules/ssl/ssl_expr_parse.y
> -rw-r--r-- rbb/staff     49142 2002-03-13 20:47
> httpd-2.0.35/modules/ssl/ssl_expr_scan.c
> -rw-r--r-- rbb/staff      6492 2002-03-13 20:47
> httpd-2.0.35/modules/ssl/ssl_expr_scan.l

But *DAMN*, he's right:

ssl_expr_parse.c   1.6   3 months   wrowe   This patch eliminated from...
ssl_expr_parse.h   1.6   3 months   wrowe   This patch eliminated from...
ssl_expr_parse.y   1.5   4 weeks   fielding Update our copyright for this year.

ssl_expr_scan.c    1.8   4 weeks   fielding Update our copyright for this year.
ssl_expr_scan.l    1.5   4 weeks   fielding Update our copyright for this year.


Ouch.

I'll touch the necessary files and recommit them.  Does anyone object to
having these generated files in the repository?  While it causes headaches
such as this, I don't see that we have much of a choice given the fact
that some of our platforms probably don't have the right tools to generate
these files on their own... plus removing them would require changing the
tarball building script [not that that's not doable].

--Cliff


--------------------------------------------------------------
   Cliff Woolley
   cliffwoolley@yahoo.com
   Charlottesville, VA



Mime
View raw message