httpd-dev mailing list archives

Site index · List index
Message view « Date » · « Thread »
Top « Date » · « Thread »
From "Sander Striker" <>
Subject RE: Bumping tags
Date Wed, 01 May 2002 07:07:19 GMT
> From: Roy T. Fielding []
> Sent: 01 May 2002 00:09

> >> Well then why are the patches in the tree??? I'm not sure I like the 
> >> idea of
> >> tagging and then tagging just some files. Seems like if we haven't got a
> >> stable HEAD we shouldn't be tagging. We got into this whole business of
> >> tagging often as a way of avoiding having this sort of thing. Ifw e 
> >> tagged
> >> and it wasn't stable, who cares. Just retag when it is and move on...
> >>
> >> This seems to be a growing trend and one I think we should stop.
> >
> > I disagree.  I see a lot of value in managing a release by tagging then 
> > selectively
> > picking up showstopper fixes. And the RM should make the decision if this 
> > is the way he
> > wants to get the release out.
> I strongly dislike the action of tagging the tree with a version number
> and then moving that tag.  If we aren't sure about the version, then the
> RM should use a personal tag and only replace it with the real version tag

Should we invent an RM prerelease tag which will be removed after the final
tag with the version number?

> when we are sure.  If people aren't willing to run up the version numbers,
> then they shouldn't tag them as such until the version is ready for 
> tarball.
> Justin already showed that an RM can do it this way effectively.

Point taken.  I'll remember that for my next RM adventure.  For this release
I'd like to continue like I started (one last bump), so we can get 2.0.36 out
the door.  And yes, I liked justins method aswell.

/me slaps himself for not tagging with STRIKER first...
> .....Roy


View raw message