httpd-dev mailing list archives

Site index · List index
Message view « Date » · « Thread »
Top « Date » · « Thread »
From Jim Jagielski <...@jaguNET.com>
Subject Re: 2.0.35 for Darwin was Re: where to describe critical
Date Tue, 09 Apr 2002 16:40:33 GMT
Pier Fumagalli wrote:
> 
> "Ryan Bloom" <rbb@covalent.net> wrote:
> 
> > The problem is that when we went to libtool, we called this out as a
> > problem (in fact, many people said they had seen this happen before).
> > The group's decision was that we could just make it happen.  If we need
> > Sascha to submit the patches, then let's ask him to do it.  If that
> > still doesn't work, then we have a bunch of intelligent developers on
> > this list.  We can re-write libtool so that we aren't dependant on a
> > group of developers who don't want external help.
> 
> A BIG F**KING +1 ON THE REWRITE... The versioning idea behind it is just
> way-too-bogus to even be fun! :) And no, I'm not volunteering to do it! :)
> 
>     Pier (GNU LibTool is worse than BugZilla)
> 

I recall a get together after one of the ApacheCons... the battle cry was
'libtool' must die. First course of action is to determine, exactly, what
we are using libtool for. I'm sure we'll get a variety of answers. :)

-- 
===========================================================================
   Jim Jagielski   [|]   jim@jaguNET.com   [|]   http://www.jaguNET.com/
      "A society that will trade a little liberty for a little order
             will lose both and deserve neither" - T.Jefferson

Mime
View raw message