httpd-dev mailing list archives

Site index · List index
Message view « Date » · « Thread »
Top « Date » · « Thread »
From Austin Gonyou <aus...@coremetrics.com>
Subject Re: updated worker, threadpool, and leader/follower performance c omparisons
Date Mon, 29 Apr 2002 16:56:55 GMT
Damn...this is getting close. It's getting there it looks like. I can't
help but think the final outcome might be a choice of worker OR
leader/follower. I'll take a hit in the CPU to have closer avg load
between worker and leader/follower as well as the requests/sec being
what they are. 

Ohh..if only.. :) 
On Sun, 2002-04-28 at 23:02, Brian Pane wrote:
>  > With a single listener port (I'll run multi-listener tests later
> today),
>  >
>  > MPM          Requests    Mean resp.  CPU       CPU
>  > type        per second   time (ms)   load  utilization
>  > ------------------------------------------------------
>  > worker         1250        37.4       6.1       65%
>  > leader         1175        40.0       5.6       61%
>  > threadpool     1012        47.1       4.2       47%
> 
> with two listeners,
> 
> MPM          Requests    Mean resp.  CPU       CPU
> type        per second   time (ms)   load  utilization
> ------------------------------------------------------
> worker         1071        44.3       4.1       51%
> leader          964        49.4       3.9       46%
> threadpool      997        47.8       3.9       46%
> 
> 
> 
-- 
Austin Gonyou
Systems Architect, CCNA
Coremetrics, Inc.
Phone: 512-698-7250
email: austin@coremetrics.com

"It is the part of a good shepherd to shear his flock, not to skin it."
Latin Proverb

Mime
View raw message