httpd-dev mailing list archives

Site index · List index
Message view « Date » · « Thread »
Top « Date » · « Thread »
From "David Reid" <dr...@jetnet.co.uk>
Subject Re: Atomics in general
Date Sat, 27 Apr 2002 18:07:05 GMT
I'm more in favour of diabled by default and a switch to enable.

If 2.0.36 does look good then binaries will be required (given we have
binaries for .35) and I'd rather we avoided too many issues. 2.0.37 won't be
far away and maybe we'll have fixed it by then.

david

----- Original Message -----
From: "Jeff Trawick" <trawick@attglobal.net>
To: <dev@httpd.apache.org>
Cc: <dev@apr.apache.org>
Sent: Friday, April 26, 2002 4:10 PM
Subject: Re: Atomics in general


> Jim Jagielski <jim@jaguNET.com> writes:
>
> > Maybe we should have atomics disabled by default, at least right
> > now... with the build problems on some Linuxes and the Solaris
> > compatibility stuff, it's been snagging us. I don't want it to
> > delay 2.0.36 if possible.
>
> I could go for that or for a --disable-atomic switch which could be
> used to alleviate any problems if they happen.
>
> --
> Jeff Trawick | trawick@attglobal.net
> Born in Roswell... married an alien...
>


Mime
View raw message