httpd-dev mailing list archives

Site index · List index
Message view « Date » · « Thread »
Top « Date » · « Thread »
From Cliff Woolley <>
Subject Re: [PATCH] invalid HTTP status codes in access log
Date Fri, 22 Mar 2002 21:33:55 GMT
On Fri, 22 Mar 2002, Ryan Bloom wrote:

> but the second has me stumped.  If the user aborts the connection we
> shouldn't log 200, but I don't know what is correct.  Ryan and I decided
> to use 206 for now.  Can I get some opinions on the correct value?

IMO, the access log should *always* reflect the status code that was (or
would have been) sent to the client, regardless of whether the client
aborted the transaction.  Noting that the client aborted the transaction
is the error log's job.


   Cliff Woolley
   Charlottesville, VA

View raw message