Return-Path: Delivered-To: apmail-httpd-dev-archive@httpd.apache.org Received: (qmail 36551 invoked by uid 500); 6 Feb 2002 21:03:30 -0000 Mailing-List: contact dev-help@httpd.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk Reply-To: dev@httpd.apache.org list-help: list-unsubscribe: list-post: Delivered-To: mailing list dev@httpd.apache.org Received: (qmail 36526 invoked from network); 6 Feb 2002 21:03:28 -0000 X-Authentication-Warning: rdu163-40-092.nc.rr.com: trawick set sender to trawick@attglobal.net using -f Sender: trawick@rdu163-40-092.nc.rr.com To: dev@httpd.apache.org Subject: Re: 2.0.31 + fixes References: <20020206183203.51563.qmail@icarus.apache.org> <20020206184548.GW28973@ebuilt.com> From: Jeff Trawick Date: 06 Feb 2002 16:01:52 -0500 In-Reply-To: <20020206184548.GW28973@ebuilt.com> Message-ID: Lines: 29 User-Agent: Gnus/5.0808 (Gnus v5.8.8) Emacs/20.7 MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii X-Spam-Rating: daedalus.apache.org 1.6.2 0/1000/N Justin Erenkrantz writes: > I've now posted a patch against 2.0.31 that should fix all problems > seen so far that have been listed in STATUS. > > It's at: > > http://www.apache.org/~jerenkrantz/httpd-2.0.jre.patch What Greg is running now is missing this stuff from your patch: . canonical name change . loglevel changes . anonymous shmem calculation (run-time error) . shmem ptr arithmetic (compile-time error) I have no strong feelings about whether or not the canonical name change should be in a hypothetical 2.0.32 beta. I think the other three items should definitely be in a hypothetical 2.0.32 beta. I didn't compare Greg's dbm patches with those sections of your patch. As long as daedalus can open the bug db password file with 2.0.32 I'm relatively happy :) (That is the extent to which I could verify it anyway.) -- Jeff Trawick | trawick@attglobal.net | PGP public key at web site: http://www.geocities.com/SiliconValley/Park/9289/ Born in Roswell... married an alien...