Return-Path: Delivered-To: apmail-httpd-dev-archive@httpd.apache.org Received: (qmail 26356 invoked by uid 500); 1 Mar 2002 06:46:29 -0000 Mailing-List: contact dev-help@httpd.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk Reply-To: dev@httpd.apache.org list-help: list-unsubscribe: list-post: Delivered-To: mailing list dev@httpd.apache.org Received: (qmail 26343 invoked from network); 1 Mar 2002 06:46:29 -0000 Date: Thu, 28 Feb 2002 22:46:40 -0800 From: Justin Erenkrantz To: dev@httpd.apache.org Subject: Re: installing binaries in sbin? Message-ID: <20020301064640.GK15423@ebuilt.com> Mail-Followup-To: Justin Erenkrantz , dev@httpd.apache.org References: <3C7F2285.5090202@cnet.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <3C7F2285.5090202@cnet.com> User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.0i X-AntiVirus: scanned for viruses by AMaViS 0.2.1-pre3 (http://amavis.org/) X-Spam-Rating: daedalus.apache.org 1.6.2 0/1000/N On Thu, Feb 28, 2002 at 10:41:09PM -0800, Brian Pane wrote: > Did something break just recently in the configure script for 2.0? > A 'make install' is installing the httpd binary in prefix/sbin rather > than prefix/bin Welcome to autoconf. I believe Aaron and Thom are writing their own parsers to parse the arguments because what autoconf has doesn't support our concept of layouts. So, until then, paths are a bit broken. They promise it'll be fixed soon (perhaps tomorrow). -- justin