Return-Path: Delivered-To: apmail-httpd-dev-archive@httpd.apache.org Received: (qmail 69087 invoked by uid 500); 16 Feb 2002 05:52:53 -0000 Mailing-List: contact dev-help@httpd.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk Reply-To: dev@httpd.apache.org list-help: list-unsubscribe: list-post: Delivered-To: mailing list dev@httpd.apache.org Received: (qmail 69074 invoked from network); 16 Feb 2002 05:52:53 -0000 Date: Fri, 15 Feb 2002 22:05:33 -0800 From: Daniel Lopez To: dev@httpd.apache.org, rbb@covalent.net Subject: Re: 2.0.32 as GA candidate? Re: [PROPOSAL] 2.0.32 beta announcement Message-ID: <20020215220533.A9447@rawbyte.com> References: <3C6DF0EF.2030102@pacbell.net> <000901c1b6ad$46379610$0a01230a@KOJ> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii X-Mailer: Mutt 1.0.1i In-Reply-To: <000901c1b6ad$46379610$0a01230a@KOJ>; from rbb@covalent.net on Fri, Feb 15, 2002 at 09:46:26PM -0800 Sender: daniel@rawbyte.com X-Spam-Rating: daedalus.apache.org 1.6.2 0/1000/N Just for the record, it seems someone already saw the tarball and posted it to freshmeat. http://freshmeat.net/releases/69982/ > > >Design and implementation of Apache 2.0 is nearing completion. Module > > >authors are encouraged to review the Apache 2.0 API and share any > > >concerns with the Apache development team at dev@httpd.apache.org. > > >This is your best opportunity to ensure that your issues are > > >addressed prior to an Apache 2.0 General Availability release. > > > > > >Bill sez... 2.0.32 may very well be our first GA release... > > > > > > > I have one concern about 2.0.32 as a GA candidate. > > > > In order to fix the last of the performance problems > > in 2.0.x, we'll need to incorporate free lists for > > buckets (the stuff that Cliff is working on). I'm > > assuming that the bucket free list will require API > > changes. If so, then it would be difficult for 3rd > > party module maintainers if we announced a 2.0.32 GA > > release, with bucket-brigade-based filter support as > > one of its major new features relative to 1.3, and then > > released 2.0.33 or .34 with API changes to the bucket > > code shortly thereafter. > > I have a pretty major concern about releasing .32 as a GA product. We > haven't had a whole lot of beta's. I would really like to get this beta > into a lot of people's hands, and hopefully get our next release to be a > GA release. I think that the best way to do this, is to send a message > to krow@slashdot.org when we release .32. The message to krow should > suggest that we believe that we are close to a GA product, but that we > want to get this beta into as many hands as possible. Krow is the guy > who posts Apache news to Slashdot. If he mentions that in the /. post, > a lot of should download and test, and we can feel more confidant about > the quality of this release. > > Ryan > >