Return-Path: Delivered-To: apmail-httpd-dev-archive@httpd.apache.org Received: (qmail 88609 invoked by uid 500); 1 Feb 2002 21:54:13 -0000 Mailing-List: contact dev-help@httpd.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk Reply-To: dev@httpd.apache.org list-help: list-unsubscribe: list-post: Delivered-To: mailing list dev@httpd.apache.org Received: (qmail 88594 invoked from network); 1 Feb 2002 21:54:13 -0000 Date: Fri, 1 Feb 2002 13:52:38 -0800 From: Justin Erenkrantz To: dev@httpd.apache.org Subject: Re: Apache 2_0_31 is now rolled Message-ID: <20020201215237.GA22287@ebuilt.com> Mail-Followup-To: Justin Erenkrantz , dev@httpd.apache.org References: <3C5AFD0B.5080609@apache.org> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <3C5AFD0B.5080609@apache.org> User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.0i X-AntiVirus: scanned for viruses by AMaViS 0.2.1-pre3 (http://amavis.org/) X-Spam-Rating: daedalus.apache.org 1.6.2 0/1000/N On Fri, Feb 01, 2002 at 12:39:39PM -0800, Ian Holsman wrote: > and available on http://www.apache.org/dist/httpd/httpd-2_0_31-alpha.tar.gz One note that Aaron pointed out is that the tarball extracts to apache_2.0.31 instead of httpd-2_0_31. Ian tarred it up as apache_2.0.31 instead of httpd-2_0_31 - the howto release page says to use apache_2.0.31, but AIUI, that's not our convention anymore - we use httpd-X_Y_Z now. So, I renamed the tarball when I placed it on daedalus, so that's my fault. But, that shouldn't stop us from beta status as its a packaging issue that is trivial to resolve. -- justin