Return-Path: Delivered-To: apmail-httpd-dev-archive@httpd.apache.org Received: (qmail 64239 invoked by uid 500); 14 Feb 2002 02:22:23 -0000 Mailing-List: contact dev-help@httpd.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk Reply-To: dev@httpd.apache.org list-help: list-unsubscribe: list-post: Delivered-To: mailing list dev@httpd.apache.org Received: (qmail 64224 invoked from network); 14 Feb 2002 02:22:22 -0000 Message-ID: <015501c1b4fe$47bdabb0$94c0b0d0@v505> From: "William A. Rowe, Jr." To: References: <20020214014200.GM28973@ebuilt.com> Subject: Re: [PATCH] zap an uninteresting debug message Date: Wed, 13 Feb 2002 20:17:45 -0600 MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Priority: 3 X-MSMail-Priority: Normal X-Mailer: Microsoft Outlook Express 5.50.4522.1200 X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft MimeOLE V5.50.4910.0300 X-OriginalArrivalTime: 14 Feb 2002 02:21:16.0139 (UTC) FILETIME=[47BDABB0:01C1B4FE] X-Spam-Rating: daedalus.apache.org 1.6.2 0/1000/N From: "Justin Erenkrantz" Sent: Wednesday, February 13, 2002 7:42 PM > On Wed, Feb 13, 2002 at 08:30:35PM -0500, Jeff Trawick wrote: > > any complaints? > > Eww. I had all this logic to avoid printing certain codes (and I > seemed to have missed some codes too because they are normal in HTTP > serving). I took those conditionals out in r1.79 and demoted the > error to debug logging in the hopes that people would ignore them. > > If no one even wants to see these messages in debug, let's just toss > this log message entirely. -- justin ++1! I'd even suggest they disappear from 'your' .32 Justin ... we know how freaked out users get at silly messages :) Bill