Mailing-List: contact dev-help@httpd.apache.org; run by ezmlm
Precedence: bulk
Reply-To: dev@httpd.apache.org
Reply-To: <rbb@covalent.net>
From: "Ryan Bloom" <rbb@covalent.net>
To: <dev@httpd.apache.org>
Subject: RE: cvs commit: httpd-2.0/server core.c
Date: Tue, 26 Feb 2002 07:57:44 -0800
Organization: Covalent Technologies
Message-ID: <002e01c1bede$5458d6d0$7f00000a@KOJ>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain;
	charset="US-ASCII"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
In-Reply-To: <3C7BB152.D4DE68F6@Golux.Com>
Importance: Normal


> Ryan Bloom wrote:
> >
> > I don't care how de-stabilized the code base becomes.
> 
> That's a very alarming thing to read.
> 
> Making perchild work is one thing.  Warping, or even just tweaking,
> common code in order to make perchild work is something else
> again.

If you read the statement in context, it shouldn't be alarming.  It was
in response to a statement that we shouldn't be re-writing any code,
because it destabilizes the current code.  I patently disagree with that
statement.

I also disagree that just tweaking common code should be a problem.
Perhaps most importantly though, I don't think the changes for perchild
will extend beyond the MPM.

Ryan