httpd-dev mailing list archives

Site index · List index
Message view « Date » · « Thread »
Top « Date » · « Thread »
From jean-frederic clere <>
Subject Re: 2.0.32 has been released.
Date Thu, 14 Feb 2002 16:20:17 GMT

I have done the configure:
./configure --prefix=/export/home/apache20/apache32 \

It fails:
configure:3147: gcc -c -g -O2 -pthreads -DSOLARIS2=8 -D_POSIX_PTHREAD_SEMANTICS
-D_REENTRANT -I/export/home/apache20/httpd-2.0.32/srclib/apr/include
-I/export/home/apache20/httpd-2.0.32/srclib/apr/include conftest.c 1>&5
configure:3142:20: #error You need APR random support to use auth_digest.
May be auth_digest should be disabled...



Justin Erenkrantz wrote:
> I received 3 +1s to make JRE_1 .32, so it became 2.0.32 (with a
> CVS tag of APACHE_2_0_32).
> Committers and non-committers, please vote for beta from this
> tarball.  Once it is approved as a beta, the formal release notes
> will be made with appropriate posts to current-testers and other
> places as required.
> Since I need 3 +1s for .32 to call it beta, I placed it up as an
> alpha (2 +1s so far for beta).  I'm certainly hopeful that this
> will be a beta shortly.  (If you dare vote -1 and you didn't
> test JRE_1 when I asked for feedback, I will come after you with
> a baseball bat.)
> This build has been running on daedalus for over three days now
> (with one minor tweak that is in this release for mod_negotiation),
> so I believe it has passed our dog food test, but Greg Ames has the
> final word on daedalus's vote.
> Some random notes:
> - autoconf 2.13 and libtool 1.4.2 were used to generate the .gz
>   tarball.  IMHO, if this combination doesn't work on your platform,
>   then you need to run ./buildconf yourself.  I don't particularly
>   care to roll tarballs for every oddball platform.
> - I hacked httpd_roll_release to leave in ".", so the tarball
>   produces httpd-2.0.32 directory when extracted.
> - Because I wanted libtool 1.4.2 for the .tar.gz, I rolled it on my
>   local Linux box.  However, that box doesn't have compress, so I
>   couldn't post .Z files.  If someone needs them, I'm hoping someone
>   can volunteer to post a good .Z file.  (The same goes for Win32 and
>   .zip files.)
> - Since I can not recommend .31 now (and I believe none of us can
>   either), I removed those files from /dist/httpd/ since it now has
>   been obsoleted by .32.  I hope this is/was correct policy.
> - I've tested this with httpd-test and all the tests pass (even
>   negotiation suprisingly enough!).  (I have heard sporadic reports
>   of failures with httpd-test, but I can *not* reproduce any of
>   them.)
> Enjoy.  -- justin

View raw message