httpd-dev mailing list archives

Site index · List index
Message view « Date » · « Thread »
Top « Date » · « Thread »
From Ian Holsman <i...@apache.org>
Subject Re: [PATCH] Re: bugdb userdatabase
Date Wed, 06 Feb 2002 18:47:35 GMT
Greg Ames wrote:
> Justin Erenkrantz wrote:
> 
> 
>>I could have sworn that I committed that.  Aha!  In fact, I posted
>>a patch on 7 Jan for this.  
>>
> 
> applied, but:
> 
> configuring package in srclib/apr-util now
> [...]
> checking for ldap support...checking for gdbm.h... no
> checking for db4/db.h... no
> checking for db.h... yes
> checking for db_create in -ldb... no
> checking for db3/db.h... no
> checking for db.h... (cached) yes
> checking for db_create in -ldb... (cached) no
> checking for db2/db.h... no
> checking for db.h... (cached) yes
> checking for db_open in -ldb... no
> checking for db1/db.h... no
> checking for db_185.h... no
> checking for Berkeley DB... not found           <== ???
> checking for default DBM... sdbm (default)
> 
> from srclib/apr-util/include/apu.h:
> 
> /*
>  * we always have SDBM (it's in our codebase)
>  */
> #define APU_HAVE_SDBM   1
> #define APU_HAVE_GDBM   0
> #define APU_HAVE_DB     0
> 
> This doesn't look right.  
> 
> Has anyone tested this stuff on a system with Berkely DB?  I would think that
> would be a logical thing to do before yanking mod_auth_db.
> 
I testing this on win32&linux before I commited the changes to mod_auth_dbm.
I testing it with DB3/4 not 1, which is what the problem seems to be.

> We're going back to 2.0.29 tonight.
> 
> Greg
> 
> 




Mime
View raw message