httpd-dev mailing list archives

Site index · List index
Message view « Date » · « Thread »
Top « Date » · « Thread »
From Greg Ames <>
Subject Re: [PATCH] Re: bugdb userdatabase
Date Wed, 06 Feb 2002 15:28:22 GMT
Justin Erenkrantz wrote:
> On Tue, Feb 05, 2002 at 11:10:41PM -0500, Greg Ames wrote:
> > Has anyone tested this stuff on a system with Berkely DB?  I would think that
> > would be a logical thing to do before yanking mod_auth_db.
> FreeBSD's variant wasn't detected (I have to use BDB 4.0.14 for SVN,
> so I never use anything else).  

Thanks!  I think you're saying that you tested some variant of Berkely DB, so I
feel much better about this change.

> If you are interested, you can use testdbm in apr-util/test like so:
> testdbm -t DB cat /home/apmail/bugdbaccounts

I'm definately interested.

> to ensure that apr-util can read it correctly.  And, if apr-util
> can read it, mod_auth_dbm better be able to.  =)  I tested with
> testdbm on daedalus, so we should be fine there.

beautyous :) :)
> What would be a timeframe to try to go back to .31 with this
> fix in?  

my top priorities:

1. insure the bug db stuff works post-.31
2. check out the new flavor of core dump Jeff moved into
3. torture test the input side code with prematurely closed connections
4. get .31 + new patches running live on daedalus
5. think about how we can re-tag a stable set of code similar to that in step 4

>      As you can tell, we need the feedback, *but* we are
> getting a rather quick turnaround on any problems.  =)  

yep...I definately appreciate your efforts, and hope you got enough sleep last
nite and/or coffee today :)


View raw message