httpd-dev mailing list archives

Site index · List index
Message view « Date » · « Thread »
Top « Date » · « Thread »
From Jim Jagielski <...@jaguNET.com>
Subject Re: Apache 2_0_31 is now rolled
Date Sat, 02 Feb 2002 20:18:55 GMT
Ryan Bloom wrote:
> 
> > > Once the tarball is rolled, that's it, move on to the next version.
> > >
> > 
> > +1 (for Apache 2)
> 
> I disagree, strongly.  :-)  In this case, the tarball was rolled, but it
> was rolled incorrectly (my fault for not updating the how_to_release
> site). The code was fine, but the tarball needed to be re-rolled.  IF
> the code needed to be modified greatly, I would agree, but for a simple
> re-roll without changing code or tag, we don't need to bump version
> numbers.
> 

AFAIK, it's *always* been the policy that once rolled, if *anything*
goes wrong, you have to bump. Even the how-to-release docs still
say it. The *procedure* in httpd-2.0 may be obsoleted with httpd_roll_release
but not that guideline.

-- 
===========================================================================
   Jim Jagielski   [|]   jim@jaguNET.com   [|]   http://www.jaguNET.com/
      "A society that will trade a little liberty for a little order
             will lose both and deserve neither" - T.Jefferson

Mime
View raw message