httpd-dev mailing list archives

Site index · List index
Message view « Date » · « Thread »
Top « Date » · « Thread »
From Aaron Bannert <aa...@clove.org>
Subject Re: cvs commit: httpd-2.0 STATUS
Date Sat, 02 Feb 2002 21:20:26 GMT
Any reason we can't have both?

If some admins want to keep orphaned children around, that's cool.
If others want their children to die right away, for instance if
they are using a process monitoring tool, then that's fine too.

-aaron

On Sat, Feb 02, 2002 at 09:17:05PM -0000, aaron@apache.org wrote:
> aaron       02/02/02 13:17:05
> 
>   Modified:    .        STATUS
>   Log:
>   We have two factions here, let's give 'em what they want.
>   
>   Revision  Changes    Path
>   1.433     +3 -1      httpd-2.0/STATUS
>   
>   Index: STATUS
>   ===================================================================
>   RCS file: /home/cvs/httpd-2.0/STATUS,v
>   retrieving revision 1.432
>   retrieving revision 1.433
>   diff -u -r1.432 -r1.433
>   --- STATUS	2 Feb 2002 21:03:50 -0000	1.432
>   +++ STATUS	2 Feb 2002 21:17:04 -0000	1.433
>   @@ -1,5 +1,5 @@
>    APACHE 2.0 STATUS:						-*-text-*-
>   -Last modified at [$Date: 2002/02/02 21:03:50 $]
>   +Last modified at [$Date: 2002/02/02 21:17:04 $]
>    
>    Release:
>    
>   @@ -158,6 +158,8 @@
>            Message-ID: <3C58232C.FE91F19F@Golux.Com>
>    
>          +1:  Jim, Justin, Ken
>   +       0:  Aaron says "Some admins want it, some don't. Let's just make
>   +                       it an option. Not 'SuicidalParentlessChildren'. ;)"
>          -1:  BrianP, Ian
>    
>        * Make some modifications to the scoreboard creation routines,
>   
>   
>   

Mime
View raw message