httpd-dev mailing list archives

Site index · List index
Message view « Date » · « Thread »
Top « Date » · « Thread »
From Justin Erenkrantz <jerenkra...@ebuilt.com>
Subject Re: cvs commit: httpd-2.0 STATUS
Date Fri, 01 Feb 2002 17:57:19 GMT
On Fri, Feb 01, 2002 at 05:51:18PM -0000, jerenkrantz@apache.org wrote:
> jerenkrantz    02/02/01 09:51:18
> 
>   Modified:    .        STATUS
>   Log:
>   There are really two issues here:
>   - Can we *ever* build a static binary?  That *is* a showstopper, I agree.
>     And, Aaron has volunteered to fix this soon-ish.
>   - Separate from that, is the question whether we should we *always* build a
>     static binary?  That I do not believe I *is* a showstopper.  So, let's
>     make the distinction and call for a vote.

I split this out (but left Ken's comment about the default where it
was) as it really is two issues as cited above.

We've gone over the "enable static binaries by default" on the list.
I don't care to discuss this more.  Please vote if you care.

And, if you aren't aware, we've been adding lots of vote calls in
the last 24 hours as we're trying to clean up STATUS to pave the way
for a release without any showstoppers present.

Even if you aren't a committer, please feel free to cast your
votes for items in STATUS - they aren't technically binding, but we
can take them into consideration.  I will attempt to record them as
such in STATUS with the appropriate notations.  -- justin


Mime
View raw message