httpd-dev mailing list archives

Site index · List index
Message view « Date » · « Thread »
Top « Date » · « Thread »
From "Bill Stoddard" <b...@wstoddard.com>
Subject Re: Apache 2_0_31 is now rolled
Date Sat, 02 Feb 2002 20:21:16 GMT

> > Bill Stoddard wrote:
> > >
> > >
> > > > On Fri, Feb 01, 2002 at 02:45:56PM -0700, Brad Nicholes wrote:
> > > > > httpd-2.0.31 does not build on NetWare because of a screwed up
> > #ifdef
> > > > > APR_HAS_SHARED_MEMORY in scoreboard.c/ap_reopen_scoreboard().
> The
> > fix
> > > > > for this has already been checked in but I'm not going to worry
> > about it
> > > > > for now as long as 2.0.31 is just an alpha.  If you are planning
> on
> > > > > releasing .31 as beta or GA, then the fix definitely needs to be
> > > > > included.  From here on out, NetWare is good to go! Yeah!!
> > > >
> > > > We are definately trying to make this a beta. Perhaps Ian can be
> > > > pursuaded (with money, food, etc..) to do a reroll,
> > >
> > > Once the tarball is rolled, that's it, move on to the next version.
> > >
> >
> > +1 (for Apache 2)
>
> I disagree, strongly.  :-)  In this case, the tarball was rolled, but it
> was rolled incorrectly (my fault for not updating the how_to_release
> site). The code was fine, but the tarball needed to be re-rolled.  IF
> the code needed to be modified greatly, I would agree, but for a simple
> re-roll without changing code or tag, we don't need to bump version
> numbers.
>
I agree with you Ryan. What I was not in favor of is making a code change then re-rolling,
which is what I think was required for the Netware change.

Bill


Mime
View raw message